Quinn on Books: Unsolved Mysteries

Review of Mona by Pola Oloixarac, Translated from the Spanish by Adam Morris
Review by Michael Quinn
Waking up on a Palo Alto train station platform, covered in blood, with no memory of what happened or how she got there, Mona, the title character of the third novel by Argentinian writer Pola Oloixarac (translated from the Spanish by Adam Morris), outpaces self-discovery by running away. Rather than try to sort out what’s happened to her, Mona, a gifted Peruvian writer, spontaneously accepts an invitation to attend a literary conference in Sweden, abandoning her doctoral work at Stanford along with text messages from a persistent, neglected lover. Before heading to the airport, Mona vapes, pops a Valium, and ties a scarf around her neck to cover the bruises.
So much for the great escape: As the old saying goes, wherever you go, there you are. While Sweden is bucolic and beautiful, Mona skulks around in her filthy prescription sunglasses and a trench coat, looking down on her fellow writers and eavesdropping on their conversations like an unhappy spy. Although her debut novel is up for Europe’s most prestigious literary award, Mona seems less like a promising ingénue than a bitter has-been, full of disdain for the literary world she inhabits. “The phony solidarity of having a ‘Latin’ culture in common with other writers was something that had always repulsed her,” Oloixarac writes. Yet Mona is aware of both the trappings and advantages of a persona; she describes herself (to herself) as “playing the part of an overeducated Latina adrift in Trump’s America.”
Though she doesn’t recognize it, Mona is not so different from the other 12 award finalists, who hail from countries all over the world, and who vacillate between feeling insignificant and like rock stars. Despite having opportunities to bond, Mona remains at a stoned remove, observant and privately critical, while the group attends panels, compares publishers, and gripes about things like TED Talks (“‘Everyone just goes around saying the same thing. Exactly the same thing!,’” one kvetches). An Iranian writer, having convinced himself he has no chance to win the big prize, uses his opportunity in front of the captive audience to make a pro-Muslim speech— “‘Europe is pregnant! Pregnant with our children!’”—much to Mona’s amusement. It’s not so much his ideas that excite her, but the disturbance he creates. Mona perks up in chaotic situations where others are made as unhappy as she is.
At heart, Mona’s an escapist: “it was the sensation of losing consciousness that Mona associated with pleasure.” Alone in her hotel room, she gets stoned, peels the Band-Aid off of her laptop’s camera (she’s paranoid about being spied on), and masturbates with a partner, Franco, on Skype. Rather than Franco, showing off is what turns Mona on. She’s hurt by his inattention—even when she’s the one with her eyes closed: “When she reopened them, Franco was staring intently at something else on his screen, focused on something that wasn’t her.”
Although Mona recognizes herself as “a total nympho for terror,” in her darker moments, alone, she doesn’t know what she’s really afraid of—or why. The bigger problem is, the author doesn’t know, either. Reading Mona is like reading a notebook full of Oloixarac’s undeveloped ideas: a 12-year-old girl who goes missing in Lima; a group of strange men, wondering around Sweden like a wild tribe; a fox with its throat slit, along with another decapitated animal. These all feel like clues but they don’t add up to a satisfying mystery.
Mona’s superiority complex would’ve been narratively satisfying had it been exposed (like in the children’s classic Harriet the Spy, when the 11-year-old would-be writer loses her notebook with harsh criticisms of her classmates, and is then confronted by them when they discover it). But Mona never gets her comeuppance. She doesn’t get much of anything at all. Oloixarac isn’t sure what to do with this prickly, unlikable character she’s created. A tidal wave of magic realism at the novel’s end does them both in. Even when we find out what happened to Mona at the train station, it feels like a cheap play for sympathy—Oloixarac’s, not Mona’s. That Oloixarac would turn Mona into such a paint-by-numbers victim is the biggest mystery of all.

Share:

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Comments are closed.

On Key

Related Posts

The People of Red Hook asks the existential question of the day by Lisa Gitlin

By now, the community meeting on the future of the Brooklyn Marine Terminal, the 122-acre waterfront property running from Atlantic Avenue to Wolcott Street has taken place. There is more about this meeting and the NYC Economic Development Corporation (EDC) process inside these pages. As my publisher has pointed out in his column last month, this decision made by the

Working to protect neighbors from ICE, by Laryn Kuchta

District 38 Council Member Alexa Avilés knows how hard the Trump administration’s immigration policy is hitting Red Hook. Avilés, who is Chair of the Immigration Committee, says that community providers have noted drops in undocumented people accessing services and a lot of talk about moving away. People do not feel safe, according to Avilés. “There’s unfortunately an enormous amount of vitriol

Year of the Snake celebrated at Red Hook school by Nathan Weiser

PS 676/Harbor Middle School had another family fun night on January 28 after school in their cafeteria. The theme was Lunar New Year. Lunar New Year began on January 29, which marked the arrival of the year of the snake. The Lion Dance is performed during Lunar New Year as well as iconic firecracker ceremony. There was Chinese food and

Column: Since the community doesn’t seem to have much sway on the future of the Brooklyn Marine Terminal, the courts beckon, by George Fiala

Money and politics often get in the way of what economists call “The Public Good.” Here is Wikipedia’s  definition: “In economics, a public good (also referred to as a social good or collective good) is a good that is both non-excludable and non-rivalrous. Use by one person neither prevents access by other people, nor does it reduce availability to others.